Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-410
- Older Model is Olympus E-400
- New Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is relatively close but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-410 was launched 20 months prior to the CX1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-410 scores vs the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-410 & Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Ricoh CX1
E-410 | CX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-410
CX1 | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | June 2007 | Newer by 20 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Ricoh CX1
E-410 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-410 and the CX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and CX1 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The image underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and CX1.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-410 will render more detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus E-410 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-410 | Ricoh CX1 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2007-06-14 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | - | $299 |