Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released June 2007
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-410
  • Older Model is Olympus E-400
  • New Model is Olympus E-420
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is relatively close but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-410 was launched 20 months prior to the CX1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-410 scores vs the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Ricoh CX1

 E-410 CX1 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-410

 CX1 E-410 
IntroducedFebruary 2009June 2007Newer by 20 months
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kSharper screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Ricoh CX1

 E-410 CX1 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-410 and the CX1.

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and CX1 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The image underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-410 and CX1.

All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-410 will render more detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-410
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX1
56
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
25
focusing manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-410
Sports photography with Ricoh CX1
42
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps low (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography factors
49
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
59
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-410 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography factors
50
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5")
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
42
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging info
Ricoh CX1 Vlogging info
9
can't record video
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-410 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus E-410Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-410 Ricoh CX1
Also called as EVOLT E-410 -
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2007-06-14 2009-02-19
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-200mm (7.1x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 180 gr (0.40 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 494 not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost - $299