Clicky

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40
Olympus E-410 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released June 2007
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-410
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-400
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-420
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-410 and Sony S2000, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-410 was unveiled 3 years before the S2000 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-410 scores against the S2000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Sony S2000

 E-410 S2000 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-410

 S2000 E-410 
IntroducedJanuary 2010June 2007Fresher by 31 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Sony S2000

 E-410 S2000 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-410 and Sony S2000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-410 against the S2000.

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-410 and S2000 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and S2000.

All in all, both of these cameras have the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-410 uses the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The older E-410 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-410 Portrait photography factors
Sony S2000 Portrait photography factors
56
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-410
Street photography with Sony S2000
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
46
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-410
Sports photography with Sony S2000
42
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,200s)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-410 Travel photography details
Sony S2000 Travel photography details
49
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
50
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-410 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Landscape photography camera
50
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
27
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-410 Vlogging info
Sony S2000 Vlogging info
9
no video
21
wide angle not the best (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-410 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-410 and Sony S2000
 Olympus E-410Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-410 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-410 -
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2007-06-14 2010-01-07
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 51 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 494 not tested
Other
Battery ID - 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing - $225