Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220
77 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-410
- Previous Model is Olympus E-400
- Successor is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-410 and Sony W220, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the W220 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-410 was manufactured 19 months before the W220 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-410 grades versus the W220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Sony W220
| E-410 | W220 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-410
| W220 | E-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2009 | June 2007 | Newer by 19 months | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Sony W220
| E-410 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony W220 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-410 and Sony W220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-410 compared to the W220.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-410 and W220 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-410 and W220.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-410 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony W220 will produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-410 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus E-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-410 | - |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2007-06-14 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 pounds) | 147 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 494 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | - | $160 |