Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-620 was brought out 7 months prior to the SP-800 UZ so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-620 grades against the SP-800 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-620 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-620
SP-800 UZ | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-620 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 comes with outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 against the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d801/4d801216a40eeb11c9a00f6451c748cd1b31b1f8" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and SP-800 UZ is 71 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8047a/8047a9dceac52a863a70ba4a182de01d333b263e" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and SP-800 UZ.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will result in greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a6fe/3a6fe7abc30d413b307b558eab9da0fb5939a66e" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc79e/dc79e06a5a1f6778121f97743cfbdf2a30086f7c" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 12 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $270 |