Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
 
               
              94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-420 was announced 4 years prior to the TG-320 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-420 scores vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-320
| E-420 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | 
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-420
| TG-320 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | June 2008 | Newer by 43 months | 
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-320
| E-420 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement | 
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution | 
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen | 
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 offers external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-420 against the TG-320.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and TG-320 is 77 and 94 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-320 will resolve more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
 
          Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus | 
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-320 | 
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof | 
| Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2012-01-10 | 
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ | 
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - | 
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 | 
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 | 
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - | 
| Cross focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 | 
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm | 
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - | 
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch | 
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - | 
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds | 
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds | 
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - | 
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m | 
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | 
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 | 
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 150 pictures | 
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | - | LI-42B | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 
| Card slots | Single | Single | 
| Pricing at launch | $999 | $0 | 


