Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d3b/58d3bced54bef37acbf33e0cc1a92af65eb0c1e4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic FH2, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the FH2 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and FH2 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL3 was revealed 9 months later than the FH2 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL3 matches up against the FH2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Panasonic FH2
E-PL3 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 9 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Olympus E-PL3
FH2 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic FH2
E-PL3 | FH2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Panasonic FH2 has specifications of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic FH2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL3 vs the FH2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3de08/3de08fb331a8d9a322b3c38f3e41622a1a5a82f9" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and FH2 is 88 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00acf/00acf730e51382723791c01acf72503d40c8adce" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL3 and FH2.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic FH2 will produce greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger E-PL3 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8981/a89815a6665a577806756036b598c2fc83b575f7" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad763/ad76300f925dc4c8dc5e2523525ba61b62fc128a" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-09-20 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic VI | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 270 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $399 | $149 |