Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-420 was released 5 years before the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-420 scores vs the TG-830 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-420 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-420
TG-830 iHS | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | June 2008 | Newer by 55 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-420 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-420 and the TG-830 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and TG-830 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specs. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $999 | $0 |