Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Released February 2018
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic GX9, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and GX9 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-420 was introduced 10 years earlier than the GX9 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-420 matches up vs the GX9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic GX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic GX9
E-420 | GX9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Olympus E-420
GX9 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | June 2008 | More modern by 117 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic GX9
E-420 | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX9 has sizing of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") having a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic GX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-420 vs the GX9.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and GX9 is 77 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and GX9.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Panasonic GX9 to provide extra detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) | 407 gr (0.90 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $999 | $1,000 |