Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
70 Imaging
51 Features
65 Overall
56
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
- Released March 2011
- Previous Model is Panasonic GH1
- Newer Model is Panasonic GH3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic GH2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and GH2 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-420 was announced 3 years earlier than the GH2 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GH2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-420 grades versus the GH2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic GH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic GH2
| E-420 | GH2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH2 over the Olympus E-420
| GH2 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2011 |  | June 2008 | Newer by 33 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic GH2
| E-420 | GH2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 provides external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GH2 has specifications of 124mm x 90mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") along with a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic GH2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-420 vs the GH2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and GH2 is 77 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and GH2.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Panasonic GH2 to show greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2011-03-23 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.71x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 15.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 442g (0.97 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 60 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 21.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 527 | 655 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 330 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $999 | $1,000 |