Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-410
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-420 versus Sony S2000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-420 was released 18 months earlier than the S2000 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-420 grades versus the S2000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony S2000

 E-420 S2000 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-420

 S2000 E-420 
ReleasedJanuary 2010June 2008More modern by 18 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony S2000

 E-420 S2000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-420 versus Sony S2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-420 vs the S2000.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and S2000 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and S2000.

Plainly, the two cameras provide the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The E-420 comes with the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography advice
Sony S2000 Portrait photography advice
57
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography features
Sony S2000 Street photography features
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
46
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography advice
Sony S2000 Sports photography advice
39
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,200 seconds)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography advice
Sony S2000 Travel photography advice
53
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
bad battery life (500 per charge)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (33mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography advice
Sony S2000 Landscape photography advice
47
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
missing Timelapse function
27
screen size is good (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Vlogging camera
Sony S2000 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
21
wide angle not good (33mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-420 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Sony S2000
 Olympus E-420Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-420 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2008-06-23 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Largest aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426g (0.94 pounds) 167g (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model - 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $999 $225