Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Sony SLT-A33 front
Portability
67
Imaging
54
Features
80
Overall
64

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-410
Sony A33
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Released August 2010
  • Refreshed by Sony A35
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-420 and Sony A33, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and A33 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and A33 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-420 was announced 3 years earlier than the A33 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-420 grades vs the A33 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony A33

 E-420 A33 

Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus E-420

 A33 E-420 
ReleasedAugust 2010June 2008More modern by 26 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kCrisper screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony A33

 E-420 A33 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony A33 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-420 and Sony A33 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-420 compared to the A33.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and A33 is 77 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and A33.

All in all, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-420 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A33 will give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography features
Sony A33 Portrait photography features
56
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
72
manual focus
good MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Street photography camera
Sony A33 as a Street photography camera
64
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (426g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
76
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-420
Sports photography with Sony A33
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
low battery life (500 per charge)
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
not so great battery power (340 per charge)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A33 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition (426g)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low battery life (500 shots)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
good MP (14MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
missing Time Lapse mode
not so great battery power (340 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography info
Sony A33 Landscape photography info
47
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
low battery life (500 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
67
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
not so great battery power (340 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging factors
Sony A33 Vlogging factors
9
lack of video recording
77
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Sony A33
 Olympus E-420Sony SLT-A33
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-420 Sony SLT-A33
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2008-06-23 2010-08-24
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 pounds) 500 grams (1.10 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 70
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 12.6
DXO Low light score 527 591
Other
Battery life 500 images 340 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $999 $230