Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced March 2009
- Succeeded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and E-P5 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-450 was introduced 5 years prior to the E-P5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-450 matches up versus the E-P5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-450 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Olympus E-P5
| E-450 | E-P5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Olympus E-450
| E-P5 | E-450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2013 |  | March 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-P5
| E-450 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P5 has sizing of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-450 compared to the E-P5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and E-P5 is 77 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and E-P5.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-P5 to provide more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-450 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
| Olympus E-450 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-450 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-03-31 | 2013-10-03 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/320s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 420 gr (0.93 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 512 | 895 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 330 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $138 | $389 |