Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced March 2009
- Succeeded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and E-P5 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-450 was introduced 5 years prior to the E-P5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-450 matches up versus the E-P5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-450 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Olympus E-P5
| E-450 | E-P5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Olympus E-450
| E-P5 | E-450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2013 |  | March 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-P5
| E-450 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P5 has sizing of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-450 compared to the E-P5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and E-P5 is 77 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and E-P5.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-P5 to provide more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-450 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
| Olympus E-450 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-450 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-03-31 | 2013-10-03 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/320s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 420 gr (0.93 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 512 | 895 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 330 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $138 | $389 |