Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed March 2009
- Superseded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-450 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-450 was launched 4 years earlier than the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-450 scores versus the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-450 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-450
| TG-1 iHS | E-450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | March 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| E-450 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-450 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-450 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-450 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-450 and TG-1 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-450 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-1 iHS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-450 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-450 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-450 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-03-31 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $138 | $399 |
