Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13746/13746b655510dbf858df8e35d753589370ec8925" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced March 2009
- Succeeded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-450 versus Panasonic FP2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and FP2 (14MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and FP2 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-450 was announced 9 months earlier than the FP2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-450 matches up against the FP2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-450 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Panasonic FP2
E-450 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus E-450
FP2 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic FP2
E-450 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP2 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-450 versus Panasonic FP2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-450 versus the FP2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f4c6/6f4c64c1d3f9833c20cc26f1e86473b97a052abc" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and FP2 is 77 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aad4d/aad4da2a7e12c12f1332962dcfb5ee1ce7fd31f3" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The image below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and FP2.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-450 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FP2 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-450 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f712/7f712c51590729511b83ec49d619d748aa8173a5" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82fda/82fda3f16fd6cfe7628729823378dc33839bbdf6" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-03-31 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $138 | $80 |