Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c79/58c794040207e91e605fedcaea71fc3f3c2b02a9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front"
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched March 2009
- Succeeded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Announced April 2019
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Replaced the Panasonic G85
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic G95, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and G95 (20.3MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-450 was introduced 11 years earlier than the G95 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-450 grades against the G95 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-450 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Panasonic G95
E-450 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus E-450
G95 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2019 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 121 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1010k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic G95
E-450 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-450 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic G95 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-450 versus the G95.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08850/08850f27a7a1a8937b8a24d8373aae3b26672c7b" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and G95 is 77 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5f48/f5f482f93dfc8e9f882f5dac3586da49bbb19a1c" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The graphic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and G95.
As you can tell, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic G95 to result in extra detail using its extra 10.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-450 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0d49/a0d4973c3748823588548f882499499e7c5f21ad" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/594c6/594c6e976e6841922e356b0169da2be2dab16923" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-03-31 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 536 grams (1.18 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 290 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $138 | $998 |