Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched March 2009
- Older Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-450 was launched 5 years earlier than the ZS35 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-450 scores against the ZS35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-450 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-450 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-450
ZS35 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | March 2009 | More modern by 58 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic ZS35
E-450 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-450 compared to the ZS35.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-450 and ZS35 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and ZS35.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-450 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-450 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-03-31 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 305g (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $138 | $300 |