Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced March 2009
- Superseded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-450 versus Pentax WG-2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-450 was unveiled 3 years prior to the WG-2 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-450 scores against the WG-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-450 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Pentax WG-2
E-450 | WG-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-450
WG-2 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | March 2009 | More modern by 34 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Pentax WG-2
E-450 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-450 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-450 versus Pentax WG-2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-450 compared to the WG-2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and WG-2 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and WG-2.
To sum up, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-450 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Pentax WG-2 will offer greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-450 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-03-31 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 192g (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 260 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $138 | $350 |