Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released March 2009
- Succeeded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-450 was revealed about the same time to the HZ10W which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-450 matches up versus the HZ10W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-450 & Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Samsung HZ10W
| E-450 | HZ10W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-450
| HZ10W | E-450 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ10W
| E-450 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2009 | May 2009 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 enjoys external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-450 against the HZ10W.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and HZ10W is 77 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The picture here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-450 and HZ10W.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact MP but different sensor sizes. The E-450 features the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh simpler.
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus E-450 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-450 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Other name | - | WB500 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-03-31 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $138 | $300 |