Clicky

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-450 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced March 2009
  • Old Model is Olympus E-330
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very well matched but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-450 was announced 14 months prior to the HZ35W making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-450 matches up against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-450 HZ35W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-450

 HZ35W E-450 
RevealedJune 2010March 2009Fresher by 14 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-450 HZ35W 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-450 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-450 and the HZ35W.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and HZ35W is 77 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-450 and HZ35W.

Clearly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-450 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung HZ35W will give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The older E-450 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-450 Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography factors
57
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
34
focusing manually
comes with face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-450 Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Street photography highlights
64
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (426 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (245g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-450 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Sports photography camera
39
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
bad battery life (500 per charge)
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-450 Travel photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography advice
53
lighter than average in class (426g)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery life (500 per charge)
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
63
lighter than others (245g)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-450 Landscape photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography advice
47
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
43
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-450
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
9
can't shoot video
31
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than others (245g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus E-450Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-450 Samsung HZ35W
Also referred to as - WB650
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-03-31 2010-06-16
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426g (0.94 lbs) 245g (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 512 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $138 $300