Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced March 2009
- Old Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very well matched but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-450 was announced 14 months prior to the HZ35W making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-450 matches up against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-450 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Samsung HZ35W
E-450 | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-450
HZ35W | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | March 2009 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W
E-450 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-450 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-450 and the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and HZ35W is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-450 and HZ35W.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-450 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung HZ35W will give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The older E-450 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-03-31 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $138 | $300 |