Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Released February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013

Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-5 and Pentax WG-3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.

The E-5 was unveiled 3 years before the WG-3 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-5 matches up vs the WG-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 & Pentax WG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Pentax WG-3
E-5 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus E-5
WG-3 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Pentax WG-3
E-5 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-5 enjoys outer dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-5 and Pentax WG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-5 compared to the WG-3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and WG-3 is 58 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The graphic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and WG-3.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-5 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 will offer you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-5 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Pentax WG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Pentax WG-3 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-02-03 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $300 |