Clicky

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
58
Imaging
47
Features
76
Overall
58
Olympus E-5 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus E-3
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very close but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-5 was introduced 19 months after the GR Digital III making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-5 scores against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-5 GR Digital III 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011July 2009Newer by 19 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-5

 GR Digital III E-5 

Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-5 GR Digital III 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Display resolution920k920kEqual display resolution
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-5 enjoys physical measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-5 vs the GR Digital III.

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and GR Digital III is 58 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-5 and GR Digital III.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-5 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-5 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-5 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
40
manual focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-5 Street photography information
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography information
71
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
55
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-5 Sports photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography features
59
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-5 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography factors
56
environment proofing
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
63
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-5
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
64
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
has dual storage slots
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse function
45
manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inches)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-5
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital III
64
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focus
includes mic jack
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
25
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus E-5Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-5 Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-02-03 2009-07-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V+ GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology HyperCrystal transmissive LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 18.00 m (at ISO 200) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 800 grams (1.76 lbs) 208 grams (0.46 lbs)
Dimensions 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 519 not tested
Other
Battery life 870 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLM-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Two 1
Launch cost $1,700 $399