Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Launched February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very close but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-5 was introduced 19 months after the GR Digital III making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-5 scores against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-5 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
E-5 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 19 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-5
GR Digital III | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Ricoh GR Digital III
E-5 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Equal display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-5 enjoys physical measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-5 vs the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b824/4b82474d4f87a3bd2bb6e51981df0da9d4f30890" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and GR Digital III is 58 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45616/45616457fe970b35e0fe408102db2d9806880f6d" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-5 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-5 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-5 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10686/10686719c71b10ed7b4f025de0972038b40580fe" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7a13/c7a13b08d492e821aa95eea3ee4defa3852ee296" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-02-03 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V+ | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $399 |