Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58


91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Launched September 2014

Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-5 (12MP) and QX30 (20MP) and the E-5 (Four Thirds) and QX30 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

The E-5 was unveiled 4 years prior to the QX30 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-5 scores versus the QX30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Sony QX30
E-5 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus E-5
QX30 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 43 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Sony QX30
E-5 | QX30 |
---|
Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-5 provides physical dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Sony QX30 has specifications of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-5 versus the QX30.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and QX30 is 58 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and QX30.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-5 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony QX30 will give extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-5 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Lens-style |
Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2014-09-03 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | None |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | 200 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-5 | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $348 |