Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
55 Imaging
76 Features
82 Overall
78
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Released February 2016
- Successor is Pentax K-1 II
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-1 (Full frame) boast different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 8 months later than the K-1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II grades vs the K-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax K-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-1
E-M1 II | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | February 2016 | Fresher by 8 months | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-1
E-M1 II | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 1037k | Exact same screen resolution |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 has proportions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II against the K-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and K-1 is 68 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The graphic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and K-1.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Pentax K-1 will give extra detail due to its extra 16MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2016-02-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 36MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 33 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 4.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 1010 grams (2.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 96 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 14.6 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 760 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $1,499 |