Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-M1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and E-M1 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was launched 9 years prior to the E-M1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-500 matches up vs the E-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-M1
E-500 | E-M1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus E-500
E-M1 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 97 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+822k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus E-M1
E-500 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
See the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus E-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 versus the E-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8360e/8360edb618973f8dacf231a1a85be673f77e751b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and E-M1 is 70 and 71 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55a48/55a48b10b961baf54757ffa08f5fefc348656f1f" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and E-M1.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus E-M1 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/318ff/318ffe692dab01e182ae9bdbfeedd8e049d3b629" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83dac/83dac1a7af3ae99813b17cb34f422531caeb6e37" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $600 | $799 |