Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
38
Features
29
Overall
34

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
  • 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
  • Revealed August 2012
  • Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
  • New Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SP-820UZ (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was manufactured 7 years before the SP-820UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-500 matches up vs the SP-820UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SP-820UZ

 E-500 SP-820UZ 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-500

 SP-820UZ E-500 
RevealedAugust 2012October 2005More modern by 83 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kSharper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-820UZ

 E-500 SP-820UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus SP-820UZ has sizing of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 compared to the SP-820UZ.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and SP-820UZ is 70 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and SP-820UZ.

To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-820UZ will produce greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
49
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
34
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Olympus SP-820UZ Street photography info
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors (479g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
37
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (485g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography details
Olympus SP-820UZ Sports photography details
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
33
excellent zoom range (22-896mm 40.7 x zoom)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-820UZ Travel photography advice
52
lighter than competitors (479g)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
55
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (22mm)
very long zoom (896mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (485g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
35
really wide (22mm)
screen size is decent (3")
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging features
Olympus SP-820UZ Vlogging features
9
can't shoot video
25
really wide (22mm)
has face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (485g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-820UZ
 Olympus E-500Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-10-21 2012-08-21
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 22-896mm (40.7x)
Largest aperture - f/3.4-5.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 15.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lbs) 485g (1.07 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $600 $299