Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0d4/0e0d4aacb66b19b548b702bfe965d618cb352c1d" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ front"
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- New Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SP-820UZ (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SP-820UZ (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-500 was manufactured 7 years before the SP-820UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-500 matches up vs the SP-820UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
E-500 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Olympus E-500
SP-820UZ | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 83 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-820UZ
E-500 | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus SP-820UZ has sizing of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 compared to the SP-820UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/009ef/009ef0ae58d442be11f10b4970355a917bb5b734" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and SP-820UZ is 70 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b8b6/5b8b62003020af04c96ccf67d5da5eab5fd8e074" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and SP-820UZ.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-820UZ will produce greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94059/9405995345baeb6fd6b3a3c9d5e5583cdd56abc0" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9195d/9195da481bd950193de79596be747f06a0818dfe" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.4-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 15.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 lbs) | 485g (1.07 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $600 | $299 |