Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-500 was unveiled 4 years before the 6000 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up versus the 6000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus 6000
| E-500 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-500
| 6000 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 | October 2005 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus 6000
| E-500 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-500 and the 6000.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and 6000 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The visual below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and 6000.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus 6000 will give extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $600 | $259 |