Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-500 was unveiled 4 years before the 6000 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up versus the 6000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus 6000
| E-500 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-500
| 6000 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 | October 2005 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus 6000
| E-500 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-500 and the 6000.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and 6000 is 70 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The visual below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and 6000.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus 6000 will give extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $600 | $259 |