Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-610, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-500 was announced 6 years prior to the TG-610 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-500 grades versus the TG-610 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-610
E-500 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus E-500
TG-610 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 63 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-610
E-500 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-610 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 compared to the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8107a/8107ad17f23fe0fa7923bfaa654a60b510ab4611" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-610 is 70 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5055/e50558f15e1276cf2e47b557429f68c45e99fe2c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and TG-610.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-610 will render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daf4/9daf4ee84a57490c11b4a4c8526c1ceab6028f4b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/220c5/220c59c24421ea5d0da6f8c42b5958229289f25e" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus TG-610 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $600 | $223 |