Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus TG-610 front
Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-610
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
  • Announced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-610, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The E-500 was announced 6 years prior to the TG-610 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-500 grades versus the TG-610 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-610

 E-500 TG-610 
Focus manually Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus E-500

 TG-610 E-500 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011October 2005More modern by 63 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kClearer screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-610

 E-500 TG-610 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-610 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 compared to the TG-610.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-610 is 70 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and TG-610.

To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-610 will render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-610
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Olympus TG-610 Street photography features
56
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others (479 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-610 Sports photography advice
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (210 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-610 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than others (479g)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
64
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (210 per charge)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-610 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse function
43
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
terrible battery power (210 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Olympus TG-610
9
no video recording
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-610
 Olympus E-500Olympus TG-610
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus TG-610
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2005-10-21 2011-01-06
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.20 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 210 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $600 $223