Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Sony RX10 II
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony RX10, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") posses different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 3 years earlier than the RX10 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the RX10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony RX10
TG-820 iHS | RX10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
RX10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 25 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1290k | 1030k | Clearer screen (+260k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony RX10
TG-820 iHS | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony RX10 has proportions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Sony RX10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the RX10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and RX10 is 92 and 58 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and RX10.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX10 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2014-03-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 1,290 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 813 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 420 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $500 | $698 |