Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
 
               
              91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-500 was launched 8 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-500 scores against the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images        Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| E-500 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | 
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-500
| TG-830 iHS | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | October 2005 | More modern by 87 months | 
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | 
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 215k | Sharper display (+245k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| E-500 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display | 
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display | 
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 features physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 compared to the TG-830 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-830 iHS is 70 and 91 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor tech.
 
          Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus | 
| Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | 
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - | 
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof | 
| Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2013-01-08 | 
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 | 
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 | 
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - | 
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 | 
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - | 
| Cross focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens | 
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 | 
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm | 
| Total lenses | 45 | - | 
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches | 
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s | 
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - | 
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - | 
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | 
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 | 
| Video format | - | H.264 | 
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | BuiltIn | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lbs) | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) | 
| Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos | 
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | - | LI-50B | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | 
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 
| Storage slots | One | One | 
| Retail pricing | $600 | $0 | 


