Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Replacement is Olympus TG-6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-5, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-500 was introduced 12 years earlier than the TG-5 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-500 grades against the TG-5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-5
| E-500 | TG-5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-500
| TG-5 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | October 2005 | Fresher by 140 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 215k | Clearer display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-5
| E-500 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-500 against the TG-5.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and TG-5 is 70 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and TG-5.
As you can tell, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-5 will resolve greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $600 | $449 |