Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd7f/ffd7f68f44b62cc6692afbe8663d94e19abfcd45" alt="Olympus Tough TG-6 front Olympus Tough TG-6 front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-6, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-6 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-500 was launched 14 years before the TG-6 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores versus the TG-6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Olympus Tough TG-6. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-6
E-500 | TG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-500
TG-6 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2019 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 165 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+825k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-6
E-500 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-6 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-500 against the TG-6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a536d/a536d1cc1b401e1a04563148f8aae05063c7f1ef" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-6 is 70 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac9d9/ac9d9f6c0ba37e6ea790cb6c865711c5b777987b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and TG-6.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-6 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0637/d06372bf2578ddc8b162ed6b95667f8d1b90f828" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6926e/6926e5b67622601628237898a446834f4b46aad6" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Other name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2019-05-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 253 gr (0.56 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $600 | $449 |