Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-6 front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
54
Overall
45

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
  • Revealed May 2019
  • Previous Model is Olympus TG-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-6, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and TG-6 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was launched 14 years before the TG-6 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores versus the TG-6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus TG-6

 E-500 TG-6 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-500

 TG-6 E-500 
RevealedMay 2019October 2005Newer by 165 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1040k215kCrisper display (+825k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-6

 E-500 TG-6 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-500 versus Olympus TG-6 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-500 against the TG-6.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and TG-6 is 70 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and TG-6.

As you can tell, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-6 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-6 Portrait photography details
48
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
40
focusing manually
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-6 as a Street photography camera
56
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (253 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-6 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
47
high max fps (20.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery (340 shots)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Olympus TG-6
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
68
great battery (340 CIPA)
environment sealing
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (253g)
MP count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-6 Landscape photography advice
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Time Lapse mode
57
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
great battery (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-6 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
34
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition (253g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus TG-6
 Olympus E-500Olympus Tough TG-6
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-500 Olympus Tough TG-6
Other name EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2005-10-21 2019-05-22
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 20.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lb) 253 gr (0.56 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 340 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support)
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $600 $449