Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
81
Overall
64

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
  • Old Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") come with different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-500 was unveiled 12 years prior to the FZ2500 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up vs the FZ2500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ2500

 E-500 FZ2500 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-500

 FZ2500 E-500 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016October 2005More modern by 132 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1040k215kClearer display (+825k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ2500

 E-500 FZ2500 
Manual focus Dial exact focus

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-500 vs the FZ2500.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FZ2500 is 70 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FZ2500.

All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ2500 will resolve extra detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ2500 Portrait photography information
49
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
71
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Panasonic FZ2500 Street photography features
57
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average (479g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
70
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
delivers RAW files
includes touch to focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ2500 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
69
excellent zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ2500 Travel photography highlights
52
lighter than average (479 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
66
includes touch to focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ2500 as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
65
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging info
Panasonic FZ2500 Vlogging info
9
no video recording
66
reasonably wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has microphone socket
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ2500
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
Also called EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-FZ2000
Class Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-10-21 2016-09-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Lowest enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus range - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution None 4096x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lb) 915 gr (2.02 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life - 350 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - DMW-BLC12
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $600 $998