Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Newer Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-500 was unveiled 12 years prior to the FZ2500 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up vs the FZ2500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-500 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-500
FZ2500 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 132 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+825k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-500 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-500 vs the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d331/8d3314ad05f7dd77bcc67d6fa1824c3b4c8e8b37" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and FZ2500 is 70 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/440f3/440f3f2c77f2fb1958c9bf7a3fd248c8668fd1e4" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FZ2500.
All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ2500 will resolve extra detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7966b/7966bbcdfeb69ba1687f1e802af64082ede10efa" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ba3e/7ba3e14cb0b0442f1e73faa6fafe7d52e3893e03" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $600 | $998 |