Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front
Portability
59
Imaging
37
Features
73
Overall
51

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/16000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
  • Announced July 2015
  • Previous Model is Panasonic FZ200
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-500 was released 10 years before the FZ300 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-500 grades vs the FZ300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ300

 E-500 FZ300 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-500

 FZ300 E-500 
AnnouncedJuly 2015October 2005Newer by 118 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1040k215kSharper display (+825k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300

 E-500 FZ300 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has dimensions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 against the FZ300.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FZ300 is 70 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FZ300.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ300 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Portrait photography details
48
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (8MP)
46
you can focus manually
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW files
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Street photography details
56
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition (479 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
59
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
provides focus by touch
environment proofing
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (691g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography information
Panasonic FZ300 Sports photography information
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery pack (380 CIPA)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
Panasonic FZ300 Travel photography details
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
59
good battery pack (380 per charge)
environment proofing
provides focus by touch
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
heavier than average in class (691 grams)
resolution not great (12MP)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FZ300 Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
52
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
environment proofing
good battery pack (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ300
9
can't shoot video
62
decently wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does have external mic support
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than average in class (691 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Alternative name EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-10-21 2015-07-16
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 691g (1.52 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $600 $598