Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Announced July 2015
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ200
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-500 was released 10 years before the FZ300 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-500 grades vs the FZ300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-500 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-500
FZ300 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2015 | October 2005 | Newer by 118 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper display (+825k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300
E-500 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has dimensions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 against the FZ300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and FZ300 is 70 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and FZ300.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ300 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 691g (1.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $600 | $598 |