Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
48
Features
48
Overall
48

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Panasonic GF3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 160 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
  • Announced August 2011
  • Previous Model is Panasonic GF2
  • Replacement is Panasonic GF5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic GF3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and GF3 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was launched 6 years prior to the GF3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic GF3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-500 scores vs the GF3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic GF3

 E-500 GF3 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Olympus E-500

 GF3 E-500 
AnnouncedAugust 2011October 2005Newer by 70 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kCrisper display (+245k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic GF3

 E-500 GF3 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic GF3 has sizing of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic GF3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 vs the GF3.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and GF3 is 70 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and GF3.

As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic GF3 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Panasonic GF3 Portrait photography details
49
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
55
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
Panasonic GF3 Street photography factors
57
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
70
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
features touch focus
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Panasonic GF3
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
not so great battery power (300 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic GF3 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
low resolution (8MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
58
features touch focus
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery power (300 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography information
Panasonic GF3 Landscape photography information
43
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse function
55
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
not so great battery power (300 shots)
no Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Panasonic GF3 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
32
screen is touchscreen
provides face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic GF3
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-10-21 2011-08-11
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 160
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lbs) 264 gr (0.58 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 50
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 459
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $600 $360