Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3e8/ba3e852d8fd2ac4c9d856754d60968dffd538032" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 177g - 99 x 60 x 30mm
- Launched January 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic SZ10, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SZ10 (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SZ10 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was introduced 10 years before the SZ10 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-500 matches up vs the SZ10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic SZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic SZ10
E-500 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ10 over the Olympus E-500
SZ10 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 112 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic SZ10
E-500 | SZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 provides physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic SZ10 has proportions of 99mm x 60mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 versus Panasonic SZ10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 versus the SZ10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a6e4/7a6e4b039a0c905d28877f9251cf17d20fb1343f" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and SZ10 is 70 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e9d5/2e9d501a5a492a6fb8f91834a6cb789c846b575c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and SZ10.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic SZ10 will resolve greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24d42/24d4294ac8dac3d90552c6e19c05c5cca2081e7a" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1527/c1527cea32138ba42ce85b3dc367c6565a6ad354" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic SZ10 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) | 177 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 99 x 60 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $200 |