Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Renewed by Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZR1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX1
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-500 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the ZR1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-500 matches up versus the ZR1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZR1

 E-500 ZR1 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-500

 ZR1 E-500 
LaunchedJuly 2009October 2005More recent by 45 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZR1

 E-500 ZR1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-500 against the ZR1.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and ZR1 is 70 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and ZR1.

As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZR1 will produce extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography info
Panasonic ZR1 Portrait photography info
48
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
resolution not great (8MP)
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography details
Panasonic ZR1 Street photography details
56
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Panasonic ZR1
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZR1 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
57
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZR1 as a Landscape photography camera
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
32
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZR1 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
28
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZR1
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1
Also called as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-ZX1
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-10-21 2009-07-27
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-200mm (8.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $600 $280