Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Revealed October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • New Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZS3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
  • 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-500 was unveiled 4 years before the ZS3 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-500 scores against the ZS3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS3

 E-500 ZS3 
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-500

 ZS3 E-500 
RevealedMay 2009October 2005Fresher by 43 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kSharper screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3

 E-500 ZS3 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-500 compared to the ZS3.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and ZS3 is 70 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and ZS3.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS3 will offer more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic ZS3 Portrait photography advice
49
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
Panasonic ZS3 Street photography highlights
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors (479g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (229g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography advice
Panasonic ZS3 Sports photography advice
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS3
52
lighter than competitors (479g)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
63
lighter than average (229 grams)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS3
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Timelapse recording
35
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Panasonic ZS3 Vlogging information
9
no video
30
relatively wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (229 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3
 Olympus E-500Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 Lumix DMC-TZ7
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2005-10-21 2009-05-14
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-300mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-4.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.30 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - AVCHD Lite
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 229 grams (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $600 $200