Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
91 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Revealed October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ7
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-500 was unveiled 4 years before the ZS3 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-500 scores against the ZS3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-500 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Panasonic ZS3
| E-500 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-500
| ZS3 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2009 | October 2005 | Fresher by 43 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3
| E-500 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Panasonic ZS3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-500 compared to the ZS3.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and ZS3 is 70 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and ZS3.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS3 will offer more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-500 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-500 | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2005-10-21 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD Lite |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 229 grams (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $600 | $200 |