Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-2 GPS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was launched 7 years before the WG-2 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-500 scores versus the WG-2 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-500 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-500
WG-2 GPS | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | Fresher by 76 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-500 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Pentax WG-2 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-500 against the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd064/dd064dd4d8bd9eae12069b9dbd76474db79451f8" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and WG-2 GPS is 70 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cefd9/cefd933218d8ed21b1de0bb8e764ce4a5746ca8b" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The visual below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-500 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a836/9a836486abfde071b7452e7493c1f4bc6bcd5a2f" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956b4/956b4edcf173c167520f81b8a0812b500163f5c2" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479 gr (1.06 pounds) | 198 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $600 | $300 |