Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sigma fp front
Portability
84
Imaging
75
Features
79
Overall
76

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Announced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Sigma fp
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
  • Introduced July 2019
  • Newer Model is Sigma fp L
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and fp (25MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and fp (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-500 was released 14 years prior to the fp and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 grades versus the fp with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sigma fp

 E-500 fp 

Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus E-500

 fp E-500 
IntroducedJuly 2019October 2005Fresher by 167 months
Screen size3.2"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.7")
Screen resolution2100k215kSharper screen (+1885k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sigma fp

 E-500 fp 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-500 compared to the fp.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and fp is 70 and 84 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and fp.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma fp will show greater detail as a result of its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Sigma fp Portrait photography details
48
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
85
focusing manually
MP count high (25 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
Sigma fp Street photography factors
56
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (479g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
77
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
provides touch focus
weather proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography details
Sigma fp Sports photography details
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
73
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
MP count high (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
comes with tracking focus
weather proofing
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography info
Sigma fp Travel photography info
52
lighter than competition (479g)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
78
weather proofing
provides touch focus
MP count high (25 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Sigma fp
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
82
focusing manually
swap lenses (Leica L mount)
screen is a decent size (3.2 inches)
MP count high (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging details
Sigma fp Vlogging details
9
can't record video
37
touchscreen
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have mic jack
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma fp Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sigma fp
 Olympus E-500Sigma fp
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus E-500 Sigma fp
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2005-10-21 2019-07-11
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 23.9mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 858.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 25MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 102400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO - 6
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Leica L
Total lenses 45 30
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3.2"
Screen resolution 215k dot 2,100k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None No
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 422 gr (0.93 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 wec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $600 $2,050