Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Renewed by Sony A380
Photography Glossary Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-500 and Sony A350, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A350 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A350 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-500 was released 3 years prior to the A350 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up against the A350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A350
| E-500 | A350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus E-500
| A350 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2008 | October 2005 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A350
| E-500 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 and Sony A350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 against the A350.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and A350 is 70 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The graphic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and A350.
All in all, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A350 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2008-06-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 674 gr (1.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $600 |