Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Renewed by Sony A380
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-500 and Sony A350, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A350 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A350 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-500 was released 3 years prior to the A350 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-500 matches up against the A350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A350
| E-500 | A350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus E-500
| A350 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2008 | October 2005 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A350
| E-500 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 and Sony A350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 against the A350.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and A350 is 70 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The graphic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and A350.
All in all, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A350 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-500 vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2008-06-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 gr (1.06 lb) | 674 gr (1.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $600 |