Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
89 Imaging
53 Features
55 Overall
53
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Released June 2010
- Renewed by Sony NEX-C3
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-500 was brought out 5 years before the NEX-3 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-500 matches up versus the NEX-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony NEX-3
| E-500 | NEX-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus E-500
| NEX-3 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 | October 2005 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3
| E-500 | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has proportions of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the NEX-3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and NEX-3 is 70 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NEX-3.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony NEX-3 will give you extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-06-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 215k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 297g (0.65 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.0 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 830 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $0 |