Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
89 Imaging
53 Features
55 Overall
53
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Introduced October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Released June 2010
- Renewed by Sony NEX-C3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-500 was brought out 5 years before the NEX-3 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-500 matches up versus the NEX-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-500 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony NEX-3
| E-500 | NEX-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus E-500
| NEX-3 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 | October 2005 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3
| E-500 | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has proportions of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the NEX-3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and NEX-3 is 70 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NEX-3.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony NEX-3 will give you extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-500 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2005-10-21 | 2010-06-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 215k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 297g (0.65 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.0 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 830 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $0 |