Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3 front
Portability
89
Imaging
54
Features
55
Overall
54

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sony NEX-3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Renewed by Sony NEX-C3
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was brought out 5 years before the NEX-3 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-500 matches up versus the NEX-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony NEX-3

 E-500 NEX-3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus E-500

 NEX-3 E-500 
ReleasedJune 2010October 2005Newer by 56 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kSharper screen (+705k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3

 E-500 NEX-3 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-500 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has proportions of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 versus the NEX-3.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and NEX-3 is 70 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NEX-3.

Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony NEX-3 will give you extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography highlights
Sony NEX-3 Portrait photography highlights
49
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
72
focusing manually
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-3 as a Street photography camera
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors (479g)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
76
screen tilts
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-3 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
52
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
Sony NEX-3 Travel photography details
52
lighter than competitors (479 grams)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
decent MP (14MP)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-3 Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse function
68
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Sony NEX-3 Vlogging factors
9
no video
27
supports face detect focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3
 Olympus E-500Sony Alpha NEX-3
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Alpha NEX-3
Alternate name EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-10-21 2010-06-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 215k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 297g (0.65 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 68
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.0
DXO Low light rating not tested 830
Other
Battery life - 330 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $600 $0