Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M5 II was announced 5 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M5 II scores vs the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus 9000
E-M5 II | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 70 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-M5 II
9000 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus 9000
E-M5 II | 9000 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II has outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M5 II versus the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b84/99b8475e17a6f19de8568a1ea08acc435e9f4bca" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 II and 9000 is 80 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/371b0/371b040371d429f35755046266bfe165caa2cbb3" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and 9000.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a7d/90a7ded39715a063968f29748d991dfa6792911b" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d50c1/d50c1d2668ee4ff270dbb0dd19af0978aac16c7e" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $699 | $300 |