Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Renewed by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 208g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX7V, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and HX7V (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and HX7V (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-500 was introduced 6 years earlier than the HX7V and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX7V being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-500 scores versus the HX7V for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Sony HX7V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony HX7V
E-500 | HX7V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony HX7V over the Olympus E-500
HX7V | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | October 2005 | Fresher by 69 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 215k | Sharper display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX7V
E-500 | HX7V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony HX7V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-500 and Sony HX7V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-500 compared to the HX7V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and HX7V is 70 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The graphic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and HX7V.
Plainly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony HX7V will resolve more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-500 vs Sony HX7V Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX7V |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $600 | $499 |