Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Later Model is Sony A68
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A65, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was brought out 7 years earlier than the A65 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-500 scores versus the A65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony A65

 E-500 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-500

 A65 E-500 
LaunchedNovember 2011October 2005Fresher by 73 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kCrisper screen (+706k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony A65

 E-500 A65 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has sizing of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") and a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-500 versus Sony A65 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-500 vs the A65.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and A65 is 70 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and A65.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-500 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A65 will provide extra detail having its extra 16MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
Portrait photography with Sony A65
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
77
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography info
Sony A65 Street photography info
56
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
77
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography info
Sony A65 Sports photography info
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
81
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
has phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A65 as a Travel photography camera
52
lighter than competition in class (479 grams)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
68
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography info
Sony A65 Landscape photography info
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
75
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging highlights
Sony A65 Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
78
screen is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-500 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony A65
 Olympus E-500Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony SLT-A65
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2005-10-21 2011-11-15
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 622g (1.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 717
Other
Battery life - 560 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $600 $700