Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") posses different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-510 was released 11 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-510 grades against the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-510 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic ZS200
| E-510 | ZS200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-510
| ZS200 | E-510 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | November 2007 | Fresher by 124 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic ZS200
| E-510 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 has got external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-510 compared to the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and ZS200 is 69 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-510 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-510 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-510 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2018-02-13 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 490g (1.08 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $550 | $800 |
