Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-510
- Succeeded the Olympus E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic ZS200, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-510 was released 11 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-510 grades against the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-510 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-510 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-510
ZS200 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | November 2007 | Fresher by 124 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic ZS200
E-510 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 has got external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has sizing of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-510 compared to the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-510 and ZS200 is 69 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and ZS200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-510 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-510 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-510 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $550 | $800 |