Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and E-M1 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 6 years prior to the E-M1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-520 grades versus the E-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-M1
E-520 | E-M1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus E-520
E-M1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 63 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-M1
E-520 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-520 versus the E-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f402/5f402fb83961584bf5147b4bedc7656f857cfdcf" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and E-M1 is 68 and 71 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a84/a3a84e12ee4183234e14dbc0194fd8be4719de0c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and E-M1.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 to resolve extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d1e1/3d1e1cafa989f34abdd5a20536776541dc1f0447" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94bb9/94bb9e6d9189b59069f236d8f6c890db7532645d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 497 gr (1.10 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 350 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $400 | $799 |