Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-520 was introduced 9 years before the E-M1 II and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-520 matches up versus the E-M1 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| E-520 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-520
| E-M1 II | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 |  | August 2008 | Fresher by 98 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-M1 II
| E-520 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 offers external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-520 and the E-M1 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and E-M1 II is 68 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and E-M1 II.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus E-M1 II to give more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MOV, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 574 gr (1.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Storage slots | One | Two |
| Launch cost | $400 | $1,700 |