Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 6 years earlier than the TG-850 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-520 grades vs the TG-850 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-520 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-520
TG-850 iHS | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 66 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-520 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has got physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-520 compared to the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30642/30642174ec2cca5cef685d5c64ead237942c1a33" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and TG-850 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1cc0/a1cc01a357ecf7d9c3d88f3f81c76e7d818a0483" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and TG-850 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will result in extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45727/457270ce893d28189aa2289b0256953a8bdba06f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac777/ac7776e3112e0dad20e222ae168d0f499d451e9d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2008-08-20 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $400 | $250 |