Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 4 years prior to the TG-810 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-520 scores against the TG-810 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-810
E-520 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-520
TG-810 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 36 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-810
E-520 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 features physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus TG-810 has dimensions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 compared to the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a0e0/0a0e084eead29d19586bc8e4622dca28bebdb664" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and TG-810 is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45af3/45af37c83beef3bc39de181d3bc788e7f8dcfc88" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and TG-810.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-810 will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84372/84372e8eaecb19f4fa1fe13723f3aafa92bbb94d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fabf/5fabf01764cdd3b0c7f7840fabcea2ecc2fc73f0" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-810 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $400 | $428 |