Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus TG-3, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was revealed 6 years before the TG-3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-520 scores against the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-3
E-520 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-520
TG-3 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 68 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-3
E-520 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 enjoys exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus TG-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-520 against the TG-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6d77/d6d771709a8b1c51301efb657791833b8a478150" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and TG-3 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fcac/7fcac044318b02dbb5b1101a2cf94723b532b129" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The picture here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TG-3.
All in all, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-3 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04ab4/04ab4211313bb58fbbf8968439ef1db22fef75c8" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a2c0/5a2c0ec1cad8af6917f815c7dd75bbeca4c12514" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 330 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $350 |